Schildmark DeutschFrançais Talk to sales

Your network has a border. Schildmark watches it.

Detection and response for endpoints, servers, cloud accounts and firewalls, with automatic patching driven by the analyst and audit evidence built in. One agent on each machine. Hosted by us, or run on your own servers.

Ask. It finds the hole, explains it, and patches it.

Ask the analyst what is exploitable, or open an alert. It names the package, the machines and the fixed version in plain words, and proposes the fix. Turn on unattended approval and routine fixes go out on their own: rehearsed first, verified after. Critical machines still wait for two people.

You askedIs anything on my machines exploitable right now?
Read as Vulnerabilitiesall machinesknown exploited first

Google Chrome on 14 Windows laptops has a vulnerability that attackers are using.

CVE-2025-6554 is a type confusion in V8, Chrome’s JavaScript engine: a crafted web page can read and write memory it should not reach. It was exploited before the fix was out and is on CISA’s list of known exploited vulnerabilities. Chrome 138.0.7204.96 fixes it; update all 14 laptops.

CVE
CVE-2025-6554
Severity
High
Known exploited
Yes, CISA KEV
Machines
14 Windows laptops
Fixed in
138.0.7204.96
Channel
winget (pilot)
Proposed fixUpdate Google Chrome on 14 machines

137.0.7151.120 138.0.7204.96

Unattended approval: on for laptops, low risk

  1. Verify
  2. Plan
  3. Dry run
  4. Approved automatically by policy
  5. Installed
  6. Verified
Remediatedthe vulnerability scan confirms the fix 0 machines exposed (14 before)
High CVE-2024-6387 (regreSSHion) confirmed on web-01Vulnerability check 3 machines, just now
You askedWhat is this, and what do I do about it?
Read as Alertweb-01vulnerability check

OpenSSH on 3 Ubuntu servers can be attacked without a password.

CVE-2024-6387, known as regreSSHion, is a race condition in a signal handler of sshd. On glibc-based Linux, an attacker who can reach the SSH port may run code as root without signing in. OpenSSH 8.5p1 to 9.7p1 are affected; on Ubuntu 22.04 the fix is openssh-server 1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.10.

CVE
CVE-2024-6387
Severity
High
Machines
web-01, web-02, app-03
Affected
OpenSSH 8.5p1–9.7p1
Fixed in
1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.10
Channel
apt
Proposed fixUpdate openssh-server on 3 machines

openssh-server 1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.10

Unattended approval: on for web servers, low risk

  1. Verify
  2. Plan
  3. Dry run
  4. Approved automatically by policy
  5. Installed
  6. Verified
Remediatedthe vulnerability scan confirms the fix 0 machines exposed (3 before)
You askedWhich Macs need attention?
Read as VulnerabilitiesmacOSfixable first

Two Macs run a Homebrew curl with a heap overflow.

CVE-2023-38545 is a heap buffer overflow in curl’s SOCKS5 proxy handshake, triggered by a very long host name. curl 7.69.0 to 8.3.0 are affected and 8.4.0 fixes it; Schildmark can update the Homebrew package. hr-lap-2 also waits for a macOS update: that one is installed on the Mac itself.

CVE
CVE-2023-38545
Machines
hr-lap-2, design-mac-1
Installed
curl 8.3.0 (Homebrew)
Fixed in
8.4.0
Channel
Homebrew (pilot)
macOS update
Detected; install on the Mac
Proposed fixUpdate curl on 2 machines

8.3.0 8.4.0

Unattended approval: on for laptops, low risk

  1. Verify
  2. Plan
  3. Dry run
  4. Approved automatically by policy
  5. Installed
  6. Verified
Remediatedthe vulnerability scan confirms the fix 0 machines exposed (2 before)

Demo with sample data. CVE details are real. Windows and macOS patching are in pilot; macOS system updates are detected and explained, then installed on the Mac itself.

Traffic crosses the border into your network. One address that failed to sign in 41 times is stopped at the border and blocked on the firewall. Outside Your network 203.0.113.47 Blocked on FortiGate 41 failed sign-ins in 2 minutes reason kept in the audit log
An address that keeps failing to sign in is blocked on the firewall you already run. The alert, the block and its reason stay together, so anyone can see later why it happened. Illustration

Ask the analyst

Plain questions, answered from your own alerts, machines and vulnerabilities. Every answer shows what it was based on, and the actions it offers follow your role.

Demo with sample data.

You askedIs this brute force a real problem?

Likely malicious, but nothing got in.

Verdict
Likely malicious
Evidence
600 failed SSH logins on web-01 from 203.0.113.45 in 24 hours; none succeeded. The address reached no other host.
Reputation
AbuseIPDB score 100
Next step
Block the address at the perimeter; keep the rule on.
You askedWhat changed on web-01 since yesterday?

Three changes, one of them worth a look.

09:22
openssl updated to 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.18 by a patch job; fix verified.
14:10
/etc/nginx/sites-enabled/app changed (file integrity).
16:42
New local user deploy created with sudo rights. Nobody on your team has claimed it yet.
Daily standupGenerated 08:00 for the last 24 hours

A quiet night, two things for today.

Alerts
12 critical, 148 high in 24 hours; 9 of the critical ones are the same brute force, already blocked.
Patching
7 fixes verified overnight; 1 job waits for a second approver on db-02.
Machines
fin-lap-7 has not reported for 26 hours.
Today
Approve the db-02 job; ask the owner of fin-lap-7.
You askedWhich machines are still exposed to regreSSHion?

None. The last three were fixed yesterday.

Fixed
web-01, web-02, app-03: openssh-server 1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.10, verified 02:58.
Not affected
bastion-01 runs OpenSSH 8.2p1, older than the affected range.
Still to check
build-3 has never reported its software list.

What Monday morning looks like

The SOC overview opens with one sentence: what needs a decision, which machines lost contact, how many critical vulnerabilities are open. Below it, the incidents waiting on you, ranked.

  • Severity is written out, never colour alone.
  • Each incident can be analysed, muted or blocked from its row.
  • Light and dark themes, five signal colours, compact or roomy.

How detection works

The SOC overview in the Schildmark console: five incidents that need a decision, endpoint status, vulnerabilities and network detections over 24 hours.
SOC overview, dark theme.Sample data

From contract to first alert

Four steps, each done in the console or with one command.

  1. We set up your stack

    Hosted by us, or one install command on your own Linux server. Your stack has its own data, sign-in and certificates.

  2. You enrol your machines

    One command per machine on Windows, macOS and Linux, or the MSI for Intune, Configuration Manager and Group Policy.

  3. You connect what you already run

    Firewalls, cloud accounts and Microsoft 365, set up in the console. No access to the server is needed.

  4. Your team works the alerts

    Triage, block, patch and export evidence from one console, with every action in the audit log.

Evidence your auditor can read

Choose the frameworks you report on. Schildmark maps alerts and failing configuration checks to their controls, warns when logs are kept for less time than a framework expects, and exports the evidence for a period as one ZIP file.

What goes into the evidence pack

  • SOC 2
  • HIPAA
  • PCI DSS
  • ISO 27001
  • NIST 800-53
  • GDPR

Hosted by us, or on your own servers

Hosted by us

Your stack runs on its own server in our cloud. Nothing that holds your data is shared with another customer. We upgrade it and watch its health; managed backups are an add-on.

Self-hosted

One Linux server, or two for larger fleets. Alerts, events and inventory stay on your servers; our control plane sees the stack’s health, version and agent list, never its alerts.

Compare the options and requirements

Talk to sales

Schildmark is priced per protected machine and agreed with you. Tell us about your environment and we will send a quote, or set up a 30-day trial for up to 25 machines.